Proposal for an ecosystem service framework for assessment of impacts of planning alternatives in a MSP perspective

-----

Please note:

The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.

-----

Abstract: 

The document is developed within the framework of the Bonus Basmati project. It provides the first proposal to turn one of the existing classifications into the marine-specific and MSP-relevant framework that can be used in BONUS Basmati case studies. 

Sea Basin(s): 
Year: 
February 2018
Application in MSP: 
Applied in a related process
Sectors: 
Nature protection
Type of Issue: 
Economic aspects
Ecosystem-based approach
Type of practice: 
Study
Stage of MSP cycle: 
Develop and implement plan
Cross-border / trans-national aspect: 
Yes

Questions this practice may help answer: 

  • Why an ecosystem service framework is needed to assess the impacts of planning alternative in MSP?  

Implementation Context: 

The work was carried out in the framework of the Baltic Sea Maritime Spatial Planning for Sustainable Ecosystem Services (BONUS BASMATI) project. 

Aspects / Objectives: 

The aim of the report is to contribute to the development of a unified framework of criteria and indicators to be used in assessment of alternative planning scenarios, taking into account differences that might exist between economic and social development, and development goals in national and local contexts.  

Method: 

As a first step, the ecosystem-based management consept is secribed. The need for a framework for impact assessment, building on the ecosystem service (ESS) concept, and explanation of why it is seen as embedded in the environmental assessment framework called DPSIR, are provided. A review of existing literature on the ecosystem service frameworks, as well as the framework and criteria for the BONUS Basmati project, thanks to the indicators from scientific articles, terrestrial ESS frameworks and HELCOM indicators, are presented. Based on a summary of user objectives indicated in policy and planning objectives related to the Baltic Sea, feedbacks on the criteria and indicators are provided by the experts involved in the MSP processes. 

Main Outputs / Results: 

Clear definitions for the cascade steps and an indicator list, which shall serve as an inspiration for case-study specific selections of indicators in BONUS Basmati, are proposed. It is expected that the case studies would provide inputs to the development and specification of the indicator list, as well as to the ecosystem service framework. 

The ecosystem service framework presented is the first proposal to turn one of the existing classifications into a marine-specific and MSP-relevant framework that can be used in BONUS Basmati’s case studies. 

Transferability:

Although the proposal was developed for the Baltic Sea, the information and methodology could be applied to other regions.

Responsible Entity: 

Bonus Basmati project.

Funding Source: 

The work was sponsored by the BONUS (art. 185), funded jointly by the EU, Innovation Fund Denmark, Swedish Research Council Formas, Academy of Finland, Latvian Ministry of Education and Science and Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (Germany).

Share

Print