A Marine Spatial Planning Framework for Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction.

-----

Please note:

The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.

-----

Abstract: 

This work has been undertaken as part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the United Nations Environment Programme jointly implemented Global Environment Facility (GEF) funded project entitled ‘Sustainable fisheries management and biodiversity conservation of deep-sea living resources and ecosystems in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction’, known as the ABNJ Deep Seas Project. A key objective of the ABNJ Deep Seas Project is the recognition of the importance of healthy, fully functioning marine ecosystems for the sustainability of marine resources. One way of supporting sustainability in the marine environment is through effective marine spatial planning. This document explores options for undertaking cross-sectoral marine spatial planning in areas beyond national jurisdiction in support of the ABNJ Deep Seas Project objective. The intended audiences of this document are national and regional-level decision-makers (including those participating in highlevel global negotiations), area-based planning practitioners and stakeholders in areas beyond national jurisdiction.

Sea Basin(s): 
Year: 
2019
Application in MSP: 
Applied in an MSP process
Sectors: 
Not sector specific
Type of Issue: 
Cross-border cooperation
Ecosystem-based approach
Social aspects
Stakeholders
Type of practice: 
Guidance
Stage of MSP cycle: 
Vision and aims
Cross-border / trans-national aspect: 
Yes
Coherence with other processes: 
Integrated Coastal Zone Management
Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Questions this practice may help answer: 

- What is the structure of the MSP process?

- What are the key elements of the MSP process? 

- How to apply the MSP framework under different governance scenarios?

 

Implementation Context: 

This publication has been prepared within the framework of the Global Environment Facility project entitled “Sustainable fisheries management and biodiversity conservation of deep-sea living marine resources and ecosystems in the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ)” (referred to as the ‘ABNJ Deep Seas Project’) jointly implemented by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of United Nations (FAO) and United Nations Environment Programme. 

Aspects / Objectives: 

A MSP framework for ABNJ, which considers the entire ecosystem, has been developed to promote the sustainable use of the marine environment and its resources, including biodiversity. The framework is presented in this report and is aimed at national and regional-level decision-makers (including those participating in international, high-level negotiations), area-based planning practitioners and stakeholders of ABNJ. 

Method: 

The MSP framework is made up of various elements, each with associated activities that could potentially be undertaken. 

Main Outputs / Results: 

A key finding was that although it is possible for MSP to be undertaken ABNJ in the absence of an ILBI, it can only go so far in achieving its objective. The presence of an ILBI not only eases application of the MSP framework, but allows more to be achieved via MSP. This is possible because an ILBI provides an incentive and legal mandate to engage ABNJ stakeholders in cross-sectoral area-based planning. An ILBI allows for a management plan to be developed in collaboration with participating stakeholders and provides the means for implementation and enforcement for such plan. An ILBI can also encourage or require enhanced levels of interaction (for example, cooperation and coordination) between sectors, helping to support effective cross-sectoral area-based planning, such as MSP.

The use of MSP in ABNJ at present, whilst ongoing human activities are limited in their scope and intensity, provides an opportunity to test, adapt and improve MSP approaches to support more effective management and sustainable use of resources in ABNJ, particularly, in light of projected increases in human activities and associated impacts in ABNJ. This proactive, rather than reactive, approach may help to ensure that marine biological diversity in ABNJ can be better conserved and sustainably managed for future generations.

Transferability: 

The framework presented here is a guide and is not prescriptive; its application will depend on the context and as such it is designed to be flexible and adaptable to meet differing needs.

Responsible Entity: 

The UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).

Costs / Funding Source: 

The work was financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

Contact person: 

Neville Ash, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Share

Print