Bringing ‘Deep Knowledge’ of Fisheries into Marine Spatial Planning.

Abstract: 

In marine spatial planning (MSP), the production of knowledge about marine-based activities is fundamental because it informs the process through which policies delineating the use of space are created and maintained. This paper revises our view of knowledge—developed during the mapping and planning processes—as the undisputed factual basis on which policy is developed. Rather, it argues that the construction, management, validation, and marginalisation of different types of knowledge stemming from different stakeholders or disciplinary approaches is at the heart of policy and planning processes. Using the case of fisheries-generated knowledge in the implementation of MSP, we contend that the fisheries data informing the MSP process are still very much streamlined to classical bio-economic metrics. Such metrics fall short of describing the plural and complex knowledges that comprise fisheries, such as localised social and cultural typologies, as well as the scale and dynamics, hence, providing incomplete information for the decision-making process of MSP. In this paper, we provide a way to move towards what we conceptualize as ‘Deep Knowledge’ and propose a model that brings together of the existing datasets and integrates socio-cultural data as well as complex spatiotemporal elements, to create dynamic rather than static datasets for MSP. We furthermore argue that the process of knowledge production and the building of the parameters of such datasets, should be based on effective stakeholder participation, whose futures depend on the plans that eventually result from MSP. Finally, we recommend that the ‘Deep Knowledge’ model is adopted to inform the process of knowledge production currently being undertaken in the diverse countries engaging in the MSP process. This will result in policies that truly reflect and address the complexities that characterise fisheries, and which are legitimized through a process of knowledge co-production.

Year: 
May 2020
Application in MSP: 
Unknown effect
Sectors: 
Fishery
Type of Issue: 
Coexistence of uses
Data
Social aspects
Stakeholders
Type of practice: 
Study
Stage of MSP cycle: 
Vision and aims
Analyse spatial aspects
Coherence with other processes: 
Common Fisheries Policy

Questions this practice may help answer:

  • What are the implications of fisheries data gaps for MSP? 
  • How can the fisheries data be considered in MSP?  
  • How can the knowledge of fisheries be integrated in the participatory MSP process?  

Implementation Context:

The study was drafted by the researchers from the University of Nantes (France) and the Centre for Law and Economics of the Sea. 

Aspects / Objectives:

This study aims at supporting the development of a deep knowledge of fisheries in the context of MSP, in order to improve the consideration of fisheries diversity.  

Method:

The authors adopt a socio-political geography perspective and review the fisheries data in the framework of MSP. The study provides a model of shifting from the technical considerations towards the deep knowledge of fisheries. 

Main Outputs / Results:

The study provides a wide scope for analysing the technical considerations in fisheries knowledge. It also proposes an alternative model for data collection related to fisheries, as well as recommendations for its use in the MSP processes (i.e. partipatory approach).

Transferability:

The findings of this study are applicable to any MSP processes as they concern the fisheries data collection and its consideration in MSP.  

Responsible Entity:

UMR-AMURE, Centre for Law and Economics of the Sea (France). 

Institut de Géographie et d'Aménagement Régional de l'Université de Nantes (France). 

Costs / Funding Source:

UMR-AMURE, Centre for Law and Economics of the Sea (France). 

Institut de Géographie et d'Aménagement Régional de l'Université de Nantes (France). 

Contact person:

Alicia Said: alicia.said@ifremer

Share

Print