Aligning with dominant interests: The role played by geo-technologies in the place given to fisheries in marine spatial planning.

-----

Please note:

The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.

-----

Abstract: 

This study explores how geographic information technologies – or geo-technologies – are used in spatial planning processes, and more specifically, marine spatial planning (MSP) processes. MSP has the double advantage of being both fertile ground for a lively epistemological debate on positivism and associated with a unique space (maritime space) that is frequently reduced to a simple planar space. We investigate the role of geo-technologies in MSP processes and in particular, their capacity to reinforce power relationships by aligning spatial representation norms with dominant interests, which are then expressed through zoning. To do this, we have decided to look at the different cases involving fishing activities, given that they are resistant to zoning and infrequently regarded as a priority in MSP. This has required us to propose a method which draws on the actor-network theory and the field of critical cartography. On this basis, we perform an initial analysis of the fishery “inscriptions” produced by geo-technologies, by examining the content of 43 current marine spatial plans from around the globe. We conclude that fisheries are generally not inscribed, or incorrectly inscribed (i.e., data and representation methods are unsuitable), and as a result, fisheries align themselves more often than not “by default”. We go on to discuss the results and suggest a few ways in which dominated interests, including fisheries, can be taken into account more effectively. Aside from fisheries, dominated interests more generally include interests that are either not inscribed or incorrectly inscribed, such as non-commercial “uses” of maritime space, non-use, itinerant activities, or elements not considered as a priority for conservation objectives.

Sea Basin(s): 
Year: 
December 2019
Application in MSP: 
Unknown effect
Sectors: 
Fishery
Type of Issue: 
Coexistence of uses
Data
Type of practice: 
Study
Stage of MSP cycle: 
Analyse spatial aspects
Coherence with other processes: 
Integrated Coastal Zone Management
Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Questions this practice may help answer: 

  • How geo-technologies are applied in the MSP processes? 

Aspects / Objectives: 

The aim of the study was to demonstrate how geographic information technologies are applied in the MSP processes. 

Method: 

The author investigated the role of geo-technologies in the MSP processes and, in particular, its capacity to reinforce power relationships by aligning spatial representation norms with dominant interests, which are then expressed through zoning. It was decided to look at the different cases involving fishing activities, given the fact that they are resistant to zoning and infrequently considered as a priority in MSP.  Thus, they perform an initial analysis of the fishery “inscriptions” produced by geo-technologies, through examining the content of 43 current marine spatial plans from around the globe.

Main Outputs / Results: 

Geotechnologies produce “inscriptions” that enable representation norms to be aligned with dominant interests. The study focuses on fisheries inscriptions in marine spatial planning. Fisheries get aligned by default in MSP as they are mis-inscribed or not inscribed. 

Transferability: 

The study can be applied in any MSP process.  

Responsible Entity: 

Université de Nantes, CNRS, UMR LETG,  

Chemin de la Censive du Tertre, BP 81227,  

F-44000 Nantes, France 

Funding Source: 

The research did not receive any specific grant from the funding agencies. 

Contact person: 

Brice Trouillet 

Brice.Trouillet@univ-nantes.fr

Share

Print